TO BE DONE
This page will explore arguments against AI through the lens of the Repugnant Conclusion framework. The central question: given the current state of AI, can it be argued that (irrespective of sentience concerns) even though AI adds significant impact for a significant group of people, it might create overall harm for a substantially larger set of people? This harm extends beyond purely financial and job displacement to include existential and meaning-based damages in an increasingly materialistic world (even if not explicitly Godless). A key challenge will be addressing the quantification problem - how to measure unmeasurable aspects like meaning, purpose, and spiritual fulfillment against easily quantifiable metrics like productivity and economic output.